130,500 causes · $320M raised · 4.7 since 2009

DAF holders and auctions

Your most engaged donors are the ones your auction structurally excludes.

Free for up to 20 items Unlimited bidders No credit card required

A community foundation's donor-advised fund advisors are, by definition, people who have already committed money to charity through your institution. They are your most engaged supporters and they cannot bid on your auction.

Why not

A DAF distribution generally cannot be used to pay for anything that returns more than an incidental benefit to the advisor. An auction item has fair market value, and receiving it is a benefit.

  • The item itself, at any price
  • A gala ticket, a table or a dinner with a benefit component
  • The "deductible portion" paid from the fund while the advisor pays the benefit portion personally — bifurcation is specifically the arrangement the rules address
  • A raffle ticket, which returns a chance at a prize

The consequence falls on the advisor. Improper distributions can carry excise taxes and other penalties for the person who recommended them, which means a foundation that lets a fund advisor bid has exposed a donor it exists to serve.

So tell them, before the auction opens

The duty of care point. Many advisors do not know this rule, and some have been told the opposite by well-meaning charities elsewhere.

  • Put it plainly on the auction page: fund distributions cannot be used to purchase items
  • Say it in the email to fund advisors specifically, warmly, as a service rather than a restriction
  • Brief staff and volunteers, so nobody at a check-in desk suggests it helpfully
  • And give them the alternatives in the same message, so it is not a closed door

A foundation that explains this well has done its advisors a genuine favour and demonstrated exactly the competence they chose it for.

What they can do instead

The design work, and it is the part almost nobody does. There are several routes and they are frequently larger than a winning bid.

An outright gift from the fund, with no benefit returned. The simplest route — a grant recommended to the campaign that buys nothing. Offer a clearly labelled "give without bidding" option on the auction page, which every campaign should have anyway.

Underwriting. Covering the event's costs, the platform, the catering or the printing so that bids go further. It is a grant to the organization rather than a purchase, and it is genuinely valuable.

A match. A fund advisor putting up a matching pool is the highest-leverage thing available, it involves no benefit, and it makes every other donor's bid worth more.

Sponsoring a grant directly. Recommending a grant to the fund or programme the auction supports, at the level they would have bid.

Donating an item. Advisors frequently have property, experiences, art or professional services to contribute — no distribution involved at all.

Bidding personally, with their own money outside the fund, which is straightforwardly fine.

The match is the one to build

Of all of these, a matching pool recommended from a fund is the strongest. It solves the advisor's problem, it is unambiguously a grant, it gives the campaign a promotional hook that lifts every other gift, and it lets somebody who cares about the foundation contribute at the scale they intended.

Ask two or three advisors for a match before the campaign opens, rather than hoping they find the give-without-bidding button.

Do not let the rule become a reason to exclude them

The failure mode is quiet. A foundation that knows fund advisors cannot bid sometimes stops inviting them altogether, and the most committed people in the institution end up hearing nothing about its campaign.

Invite them, explain the position, and give them the better options. They will frequently do more than a bidder would.

Same question, other funders

Private foundations, corporate foundations and other grantmakers face related restrictions on receiving benefits. A corporate sponsor paid from a company's marketing budget is a different matter from a grant from its foundation, and the distinction is worth knowing before a sponsorship package is agreed.

Where any of this is close to the line, it is a question for advisers rather than for a development committee.

General information, not legal or tax advice. The rules governing donor-advised funds, incidental benefits and fiscal sponsorship are technical and carry penalties — your own counsel and your fund advisors' advisers decide how any of this applies.

Frequently asked questions

Why can a DAF not pay for an auction item?

A distribution generally cannot be used for anything returning more than an incidental benefit to the advisor, and an item with fair market value is a benefit — as are gala tickets, tables and raffle tickets.

Can they pay just the deductible portion from the fund?

Bifurcation is specifically the arrangement the rules address. And the consequence falls on the advisor, who can face excise taxes and other penalties for an improper distribution.

What should we tell them?

Before the auction opens, plainly and warmly, with the alternatives in the same message. Many advisors do not know the rule and some have been told the opposite elsewhere — explaining it well demonstrates the competence they chose you for.

What is the best alternative?

A matching pool recommended from the fund. It is unambiguously a grant, it solves the advisor's problem, and it lifts every other gift in the campaign. Ask two or three advisors before the campaign opens rather than hoping they find a button.

Ready to start your auction?

Name it now and set it up later. Free for up to 20 items, unlimited bidders, no credit card.

Free for up to 20 items · Unlimited bidders · No credit card required